Well, my opinion about this issue is somewhat confused because I do not actually know much about this topic, and because in Russia the situation with internship is quite different: I don't think that we have unpaid internships at all, but at the same time salaries that are paid for the work made are too low even to call it *salary* (it's better to say *pittance*); internship is compulsory part of education, and it doesn't free you from your diploma work. Now I'm going back to American system of inernship. I agree with the first writer more because, first of all, I also tend to think that unpaid internship brings mess to the labour market, and, secondly, unpaid jobs always create wrong stimuli for empoyers and employees as well. I think all work that you've done must be paid appropriately.
I also share concerns of the second author: *caveat emptor* situation is really woth considering. At the same time author's overall positive attitude towards unpaid internship seems to me too optimistic and unsupported. The quots of happy students sounds a bit insincerely. Indeed, if your parents and you cannot afford to pay all the costs of unpaid internship without any payoff, you actually cannot apply to this vacancies. This point creates undesirable situation when only wealthy students can acquire the needed experience, and therefore get the higher position than their less provided for coursemates who can be actually more suitable for the vacancies they cannot get due to lack of experience.
Sorry for my confused argumentation. Thank you for reading.
I also share concerns of the second author: *caveat emptor* situation is really woth considering. At the same time author's overall positive attitude towards unpaid internship seems to me too optimistic and unsupported. The quots of happy students sounds a bit insincerely. Indeed, if your parents and you cannot afford to pay all the costs of unpaid internship without any payoff, you actually cannot apply to this vacancies. This point creates undesirable situation when only wealthy students can acquire the needed experience, and therefore get the higher position than their less provided for coursemates who can be actually more suitable for the vacancies they cannot get due to lack of experience.
Sorry for my confused argumentation. Thank you for reading.